Reviving a genuinely local entrepreneurial culture

david boyle2Innovative thinkers often have to wait ten to twenty years before their concepts become mainstream. Two years ago David Boyle (New Economics Foundation) listed ten linked propositions, many borrowed from the most successful cities in Europe and North and South America, which could effectively allow cities to take back control of their economic destiny.

Agreeing with the City Growth Commission that a new economic agenda is emerging in these successful cities (and setting aside the issue of the desirability of growth) these propositions offer a more interesting and convincing contribution to the Core Cities debate, than Jim O’Neill’s four points:

Boyle’s ten linked propositions offer an outline agenda – a composite drawn from these urban centres:

  1. Rebuild local economies by plugging the leaks that are draining local money away. How money circulates in an area is just as important as the amount of money flowing into it. Traditional economics suggests that cities must specialise. That may be true for the largest businesses, but it is irrelevant for local business. For them, the best way forward is not just by specialising, but also by building diversity and looking for ways of replacing imports.
  1. Develop local diversity and distinctiveness. Too many of our cities have devoted their imagination and resources to making themselves look the same as each other. But because economic diversity keeps money circulating locally, it is critical that any new developments design well-being, distinctiveness and sustainability indicators into Master Planning processes and that any new retail effort must make high streets more, not less, diverse.
  1. Bust local monopolies to let enterprise flourish. One major reason why so many of our local economies have been hollowed out is that so many cities have been using net wealth destroyers as anchor stores.
  1. Organise enterprise coaching, support and advice in every neighbourhood. Coaches, backed up by a panel of local business people, bank managers and other local volunteers, can help to break down the barriers preventing enterprise from starting, replicating the kind of social networks that successful places have.
  1. Use local resources to build an effective new local lending infrastructure. Our businesses are now in a far weaker position than American or German competitors, and potential competitors, because we have no equivalent lending infrastructure. The real problem is not lack of capital to lend, it’s a serious lack of institutions capable of lending it.
  1. Invest in local energy. At present only 0.01 per cent of electricity in England is generated by local authority-owned renewables, despite the scope that exists to install projects on their land and buildings. In Germany the equivalent figure is 100 times higher.
  1. Use waste products as raw material for new enterprises. Traditional economics confines its interest to the point where money becomes involved and to the point when a product is thrown away. Cities are often blind to the potential value of what is wasted and thrown away – because all these have potential for enterprise.
  1. Use public sector spending to maximise local money flows. Making sure that public sector contracts build the local economy, and provide permanent economic assets for depressed areas.
  1. Launch a range of new kinds of money. Successful models are now running all over the world, keeping local resources circulating locally and providing independence for impoverished communities. They can provide low-cost or free credit, and – in some countries – they underpin whole sectors of the economy.
  1. Experimenting with new kinds of credit creation for local public benefit. There will be occasions when regional economies require the creation of new public money, free of interest, where necessary to cope with unprecedented financial emergencies, and as the basis for loans to rebuild the infrastructure of productive local economies.

Boyle notes that not all of these ideas could be organised without central government support, but that the rest could be done by imaginative and forward-looking city leaders, grasping the new powers of general competence made available in the Localism Bill.

 

Read the full article here.

.

One of the first tests for the Localism Bill?

One of the first tests for the Localism Bill?

Today three messages were received about the large casino premises licence for a casino on land at the National Exhibition Centre, granted by Solihull Council’s Licensing Committee to Genting UK, part of a Malaysian conglomerate, which Property Week says is using its massive cash reserves to expand into Europe and America. 

.

“An attempt to do a Merry Hill/Dudley to Solihull?”  

Jon says that only 7% of the proposed development would be casino: “More Star City scale than Las Vegas”.

The council website describes the casino as being ‘part of an anticipated commercial development’. 

Genting UK have stated that the casino will be part of a large ‘destination complex’, consisting of a 4/5 star hotel, a spa, multi-screen cinema, conference and banqueting centre, designer shopping outlets, food and beverage outlets and car parking for 300 vehicles. 

Attracting trade away from the town centre? 

“Most would be shops and other developments which are now meant to be town centre preserve…leisure, cinemas, designer restaurants, attractive bars etc. The shops are for Bicester Village style end of line 30-50% off discounted goods: clothes, electrical etc . 

“This is not attracting in conference-goers from China but shoppers from Solihull”. 

Kirsty thinks differently and has spoken to those ‘in the know’: 

“The development will include retail and entertainment, however these will be considerably upmarket premier brands and restaurants not found in Solihull or the surrounding areas.  Visitors to this complex are likely to do just that, visit the complex and not travel elsewhere.  The business view is that this will generate income and more importantly many employment opportunities that otherwise would not be attracted to the area.” 

Local traders’ interests affected by out of town shopping centres? 

Walsall Council’s support for out of town shopping centres is said to have ruined the town centre shopping – the market in particular – and all the surrounding markets such as Brownhills. A total of 94 shops and businesses are standing empty in Walsall town centre, new figures in the Express & Star revealed today.

Out of town Mark says: 

“Interesting times…Solihull is still a successful town centre and the shopkeepers might erupt in protest if they woke up to the potential Merry Hill on their doorstep. 

“As to Solihull shops. I know that now it has Touchwood – and more importantly John Lewis – people come from far and wide – such as Rugby, Coventry and Leamington Spa. So if they have come that far they will certainly consider the NEC as equally close and convenient, so yes it could hit Solihull.” 

Kirsty is in touch with Solihull retailers and says that there has been wide consultation with regard to these plans: “Managers of both Mell Square and Touchwood have been consulted.  I understand that they are not concerned about loss of trade within Solihull as a result of this development.” 

Rob – a concerned citizen and parent of teenagers – makes two points: 

“If it becomes a shopping centre kids will be able to go there on their termly school bus pass”. 

He also asks: “Where is the public consultation?”  

On the official website we read that: “This Government trusts people to take charge of their lives and we will push power downwards and outwards to the lowest possible level, including individuals, neighbourhoods, professionals and communities as well as local councils and other local institutions.” 

Will this happen? Time will tell.